Discussion:
How did Billy die?
(too old to reply)
Bobby D
2005-08-27 15:44:20 UTC
Permalink
I don't think they showed it.
The Ghost of General Lee
2005-08-27 17:25:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
Who cares? It's comforting enough to know that he did/will.
The Baron's
2005-08-27 17:35:05 UTC
Permalink
He probably cut his penis off while off his meds.
Baron
Post by The Ghost of General Lee
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
Who cares? It's comforting enough to know that he did/will.
manitou
2005-08-27 19:42:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Baron's
He probably cut his penis off while off his meds.
An artist in Vienna did this back in the late 60s (and died of blood loss).

It was reported by TIME.












C.
tigercat
2005-08-27 18:14:14 UTC
Permalink
it wasn't shown, but he probably didn't last too long after Brenda passed
on; unless he contacts Claire which is a scary thought.
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
manitou
2005-08-27 19:41:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
Perhaps he eventually died of a rare drug-resistant AIDS strain,
acquired from Jake (David's psycho carjacker) when both were in
counselling [think Ted and Blake over at "QAF"...].














C.
Kati
2005-08-28 18:24:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
I think he dropped dead right after Brenda was declared dead.

Kati
FatKat
2005-08-28 21:00:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
They didn't show it alright. His end isn't of much importance because
by then it's obvious that he became (whether due to mental illness,
poor upbringing or simply being an asshole) a person utterly oblivious
to the feelings of those around him. Did you notice that (Keith being
the obvious exception) none of the major characters died alone?
Rather, they had earned the love of those who stuck with them to the
end (or their own). Keith would have definately enjoyed that departure
were he not rudely interrupted. The best that Billy could have
expected was being shown dying alone - Mama Chenowith herself having
passed long ago, or discarding him.
Fragile Warrior
2005-08-28 21:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by FatKat
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
They didn't show it alright. His end isn't of much importance because
by then it's obvious that he became (whether due to mental illness,
poor upbringing or simply being an asshole) a person utterly oblivious
to the feelings of those around him. Did you notice that (Keith being
the obvious exception) none of the major characters died alone?
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Post by FatKat
Rather, they had earned the love of those who stuck with them to the
end (or their own). Keith would have definately enjoyed that departure
were he not rudely interrupted. The best that Billy could have
expected was being shown dying alone - Mama Chenowith herself having
passed long ago, or discarding him.
FatKat
2005-08-28 21:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by FatKat
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
They didn't show it alright. His end isn't of much importance because
by then it's obvious that he became (whether due to mental illness,
poor upbringing or simply being an asshole) a person utterly oblivious
to the feelings of those around him. Did you notice that (Keith being
the obvious exception) none of the major characters died alone?
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
manitou
2005-08-28 22:17:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.














C.
Fragile Warrior
2005-08-28 22:34:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
FatKat
2005-08-29 01:23:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
I think you've taken too literally the meaning of "dying alone". It
doesn't mean that at-that-minute you're in a room with nobody else - it
means that you're apparently a person who's obviously been alone for
quite some time. Claire and David (and even George, by George) were at
Ruth's bedside, strongly suggesting that they were ever-present in her
life. (Who knows, maybe she finally chipped through taht wall
surrounding that heart of his, though I'd feel safer about that had we
seen Maggie in any of those scenes.) Brenda was still around at
David's last, sunny picnic (boy, that David, what a party-pooper).
David didn't die surrounded by those who loved him because he just
happened to be at some picnic when he departed. He died with them
because the circumstances made clear he was a part of their lives and
did not retreat into a shell on Kieth's death.

As for Claire (or is it Clare? How is that woman's name spelled?) died
in a room that could not have been arranged or maintained by a woman of
her age. While we can accept the idea of her being able to buy an
interior designer, there is the still that matter of all those pictures
shown in the slow pan - which testify to a life spent watching and
immortalizing others, looking at them, picking apart their feelings and
not treating them as inanimate sponges which exist only to suck up some
pseudo-intellectual pap about emotional closure.
FC
2005-08-30 00:23:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased.. If
someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there when
Claire died.
notherenow
2005-08-30 14:43:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased.. If
someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there when
Claire died.
Since the person's identity and relationship to Claire was not provided
this discussion of a nurse is entirely speculative. For all we know,
the woman in the chair in the room with Claire when she died at 102 was
Maya's granddaughter... The obits don't say who it was, just like they
didn't give the identify of Keith's killers, or give any detail on the
nature of David's subsequent partnership, be it domestic or business.
The only information that was provided was that there was a hallway with
photos taken by Claire over the course of her lifetime, Claire herself
was lying in a bed, and there was another person in the room sitting in
a chair doing nothing particularly noteworthy. As the previous poster
notes, if there is someone in the room when you die, even if it were a
complete stranger, literally speaking, you did not die alone.
Yenc-Post 2002
2005-08-30 15:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by notherenow
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was
just a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" -
everybody else was dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the
deceased.. If someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The
Nurse was there when Claire died.
Since the person's identity and relationship to Claire was not
provided this discussion of a nurse is entirely speculative.
Loading Image...


(snipped)
notherenow
2005-08-30 19:38:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Yenc-Post 2002
Post by notherenow
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was
just a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" -
everybody else was dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the
deceased.. If someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The
Nurse was there when Claire died.
Since the person's identity and relationship to Claire was not
provided this discussion of a nurse is entirely speculative.
http://img352.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cap0144bc.jpg
(snipped)
Am having trouble understanding what you're trying to communicate. It's
a nice picture though, pretty clear if a bit distant for speculation
that this is Maya III or Willa Jr. :)
Jon Nadelberg
2005-08-31 00:06:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by notherenow
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased.. If
someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there when
Claire died.
Since the person's identity and relationship to Claire was not provided
this discussion of a nurse is entirely speculative.
Unless dressing like a nurse becomes fashionable in 2085, it's pretty
obviously a nurse.
KC
2005-08-31 03:23:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jon Nadelberg
Post by notherenow
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased.. If
someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there when
Claire died.
Since the person's identity and relationship to Claire was not provided
this discussion of a nurse is entirely speculative.
Unless dressing like a nurse becomes fashionable in 2085, it's pretty
obviously a nurse.
She was dressed in white, with white shoes, but maybe that's the style
in 2085. Maybe it was an interpretation of future fashion. Years ago,
nurses wore those white caps, but times changed and now they wear
pastel tops, no hats, a more casual look. We just don't know what
nursing fashion or civilian fashion is in 2085.

KC
Fragile Warrior
2005-08-30 14:42:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased..
If someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there
when Claire died.
Oh, yeah. Like Claire would even have been able to see that there was a
person 20' away reading a book and ignoring her.
FatKat
2005-08-30 14:58:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased..
If someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there
when Claire died.
Oh, yeah. Like Claire would even have been able to see that there was a
person 20' away reading a book and ignoring her.
I don't remember the room being that big. Anyway, the nurse could have
been reading to her - Claire may be blind, but not deaf.
notherenow
2005-08-30 17:52:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by FC
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by manitou
Post by FatKat
Post by Fragile Warrior
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Correct.
With only a nurse in a chair reading a book that IS dying alone.
No, dying alone is when no one else is present except for the deceased..
If someone is with you, then how can you be alone. The Nurse was there
when Claire died.
Oh, yeah. Like Claire would even have been able to see that there was a
person 20' away reading a book and ignoring her.
Even if she could not see her, Claire may have found her presence
comforting. Seeing is not the only way to know that someone is close.
The scene we saw was reminiscent of a long-term caregiver and her
charge. She would have been alerted if Claire had been in distress.
But she wasn't, Claire expired quietly and peacefully. A most
desirable way to die.
b or t k-c
2005-08-28 22:25:02 UTC
Permalink
... (like Keith)
Keith? What about David and the boys?

...................
Post by Fragile Warrior
Post by FatKat
Post by Bobby D
I don't think they showed it.
They didn't show it alright. His end isn't of much importance because
by then it's obvious that he became (whether due to mental illness,
poor upbringing or simply being an asshole) a person utterly oblivious
to the feelings of those around him. Did you notice that (Keith being
the obvious exception) none of the major characters died alone?
Uh... the name Claire springs to mind here.
Wasn't there somebody in that room with Claire? Even if that was just
a nurse, Claire (like Keith) had a valid "excuse" - everybody else was
dead.
Fragile Warrior
2005-08-28 22:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by b or t k-c
... (like Keith)
Keith? What about David and the boys?
Were they in the back of the armored car?
black panda
2005-08-31 13:48:48 UTC
Permalink
No, but the armed men that shot him were.
So I guess you could say that he might not have died alone.

Loading...