PB
2005-09-11 19:12:56 UTC
That's what Alan Poul said about Ball and the writing process. Ball
doesn't like linear writing, wants disconnected realistic character
behaviour, etcx...
That is the only thing I can think might explain the Season 5
Nate-Brenda arc. To me, it just didn't ring true. Would have been more
traumatic and shocking to have Nate die just when he and Brenda had come
full circle and embraced each other in a loving marriage, as much as
possible.
I understood the Nate attraction to Maggie, with shared tragedy, but
that and Lisa's dalliance with her brother-in-law were the 2 glaring
plot weaknesses. Oh, and Joe disappeared pretty quick too. :)
Other than that, everything seememd about right.
doesn't like linear writing, wants disconnected realistic character
behaviour, etcx...
That is the only thing I can think might explain the Season 5
Nate-Brenda arc. To me, it just didn't ring true. Would have been more
traumatic and shocking to have Nate die just when he and Brenda had come
full circle and embraced each other in a loving marriage, as much as
possible.
I understood the Nate attraction to Maggie, with shared tragedy, but
that and Lisa's dalliance with her brother-in-law were the 2 glaring
plot weaknesses. Oh, and Joe disappeared pretty quick too. :)
Other than that, everything seememd about right.